![]() ![]() This is how the rendering looks at 100% view. (200mm because I was testing the image stabilisation on my Sigma 70-200mm OS, handheld). I really like Capture One's NR now - whether it's the NR or the sharpening that has changed, the "cross-hatch" rendering that Capture One used to generate is history, and the results make it easy to use (say) my Canon 70D up to five-figure ISOs without much trouble - and sometimes without any need for additional NR to be applied outside of Capture One.ġ0,000 ISO, with only Capture One's default NR - that's pretty damn' good, I reckon.Įxif: 200mm, f/2.8, 1/40 - very low light. These days, although Phase One has not announced changes to its NR (or its sharpening), I'm clear enough in my own mind that something is different, and the difference is significant enough that I now consider Capture One easily to be the equal of Optics Pro's "standard" NR - and that's as good as it gets outside of Optic Pro's PRIME NR, which is too resource-intensive and slow to be routinely useful. Is color noise interpreted as moire?įor a long time I considered Lightroom's noise reduction to be superior to Capture One's, as were Photo Ninja's and DxO Optics Pro's (on my cameras, and to my needs) - Optics Pro being the best of the bunch. If that is so, and also goes for sharpening and other edits, than I may be doing more and more in CO1 with the Sony A7r.Īnother thing that I noticed: the moire tool works on moire of course, but it also seems to works very much as the color noise reduction tool when there is no moire, removing color noise in higher iso shots just like the color noise reduction tool, and even with the same effect of the slider setting. My guess is, that because CO1 is optimized for high resolution digital backs (MF), the noise reduction may be optimized for files with high pixel counts, and less so for smaller Apsc files. This is only good because it removes another step outside of CO1, but has anyone noticed improvements in CO1 noise reduction overall Now with the A7r the results of the noise reduction of CO1 are better than the results of Noiseware. I was struck by the quality of the noise reduction in CO1, especially the color noise reduction, where I used to get only OK results with CO1 noise reduction on Apsc cameras, reason why I kept using Imagenomic Noiseware. I recently got a Sony A7r to use with my Zeiss ZK lenses. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |